CAB: Connectionist Analogy Builder

نویسندگان

  • Levi B. Larkey
  • Bradley C. Love
چکیده

The ability to make informative comparisons is central to human cognition. Comparison involves aligning two representations and placing their elements into correspondence. Detecting correspondences is a necessary component of analogical inference, recognition, categorization, schema formation, and similarity judgment. Connectionist Analogy Builder (CAB) determines correspondences through a simple iterative computation that matches elements in one representation with elements playing compatible roles in the other representation while simultaneously enforcing structural constraints. CAB shows promise as a process model of comparison as its performance can be related to human performance (e.g., solution trajectory, error patterns, time-on-task). Furthermore, CAB’s bounded working memory allows it to account for the inherent capacity limitations of human processing. CAB’s strengths are its parsimony, transparency of operations, and ability to generate performance predictions. In this paper, CAB is evaluated against benchmark phenomena from the analogy literature. © 2003 Cognitive Science Society, Inc. All rights reserved.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Testing CAB-IDS Through Mutations: On the Identification of Network Scans

This study demonstrates the ability of powerful visualization tools (based on the use of connectionist models) to identify network intrusion attempts in an effective and reliable manner. It presents a novel technique to test and evaluate a previously developed network-based intrusion detection system (IDS). This technique applies mutant operators and is intended to test IDSs using numerical dat...

متن کامل

Analogy - Based Reasoning 1

Introduction making the appropriate lower-order substitutions. For examAnalogy is important to connectionism by reasons of affinity ple, Clement and Gentner (1991) showed people analogous stories and asked them to state which of two assertions shared and difference : affinity because analogical reasoning lays claim by base and target was most important to the match . Subjects o connectionist ad...

متن کامل

A Connectionist Account of Analogical Development

We present a connectionist model that provides a mechanistic account of the development of simple relational analogy completion. Drawing analogies arises as a bi-product of pattern completion in a network that learns input/output pairings representing relational information. Analogy is achieved by an initial example of a relation priming the network such that the subsequent presentation of an i...

متن کامل

Multiplicative Binding, Representation Operators & Analogy

Analogical inference depends on systematic substitution of the components of compositional structures. Simple systematic substitution has been achieved in a number of connectionist systems that support binding (the ability to create connectionist representations of the combination of component representations). These systems have used various implementations of two generic composition operators...

متن کامل

Connectionist Modeling Using Lindenmayer Systems

In this paper the idea of using Lindenmayer systems (L-systems) to create connectionist models is introduced. L-systems with some extensions provide us with a method for creating connectionist models with a close analogy to the growing process of nature. The main advantages to use L-systems in connectionist modeling is its capability for controling growth of connectionist model. Starting from a...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Cognitive Science

دوره 27  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003